What you’ll see: Less than optimal solution is “settled on†Products that don’t meet technical performance requirements and/or user needs Increased testing/rework to resolve design/architecture issues Customer is surprised at the solution that resulted from their requirements
Symptoms:- Sub-optimal Supplier selection not based on the right criteria Integration of supplier products into product baseline is problematic Management and technical staff do not have insight into supplier activities Supplier issues are not covered in a timely manner Supplier products are accepted even when they dont meet the product…
July 7, 2009
What you’ll see: Measurements unknowingly used inappropriately/ out of context Management by perception/judgment vs. by fact Measurement presentations being used to confuse rather than enlighten Useless measures being collected
What you’ll see: No assurance is available that quality standards are followed or achieved Poor quality work products being produced Ineffective processes that staff avoid using No accountability for not following process or meeting standards Significant project issues are not escalated for management attention.
What you’ll see… Poor estimates that lead to cost and schedule overruns. Unable to discover deviations from undocumented plans. Resources aren’t available / applied when needed. Unable to meet commitments. Why Should You Care? Because… Customers don’t trust suppliers who waste their resources — loss of future business. No lessons…
May 18, 2009
There are many risks that are encountered. It will depend on organization’s size, culture and type of work. Some common risks encountered are:In general, most of the people, and even PMs feign ignorance, despite repeated and focused trainings. There is immense lack of attitude as well as knowledge in understanding…
May 18, 2009
What you’ll see Crisis management. High rework levels throughout the project. Lots of time spent in meetings trying to “discover†project status rather than reporting on it. Data needed for management decisions is unavailable when needed. Actions that should have been taken early on aren’t discovered. until it’s too late…
May 18, 2009
Most of the companies, unless there are very specific reasons, are interested in listing their website on the SEI PARS Website ( sas.sei.cmu.edu/pars/pars.aspx). The PARS allows the confidential information of the appraisal like project name, etc., to remain confidential, is so desired. The Lead Appraiser has to identify this –…
May 18, 2009
What you’ll see: High levels of re-work throughout the project.Requirements accepted by staff from any source they deem to be authoritative“Galloping†requirements creep. Inability to “prove†that the product meets the approved requirements. Why Should You Care? Because… Lack of agreement among stakeholders as to what are the “real†requirements…
May 18, 2009
The best criteria for the success of a process asset library is its user acceptability. Is it inviting enough to attract users for browsing it? Is it friendly enough to give maximum information through minimum clicks? Is it having the characteristic of one document flowing into the other or one…
May 18, 2009
Rajendra's LinkedIn Profile
Rajendra is a qualified and certified Lead Appraiser and Instructor for the following :
Rajendra is Lead Assessor for ISO 9001 (QMS), ISO 14001 (EMS), OHSAS 18001 (OHSMS) since 1994
International Automotive Task Force (IATF) approved Lead Assessor for Automotive Standard TS 16949:2009
Lead Assessor for ISO 27001 (ISMS) and ISO 20000-1 (ITSM)
Rajendra has 25 years experience in the industry.